Facts of how windows is better than mac argue .org

Facts of how windows is better than mac argue .org windows#

As for the speed of the network stack, there are multiple sources, here are two which I tend to refer:.

Facts of how windows is better than mac argue .org windows#

As per hard facts, you might want to read Comparing CPU and Memory Performance: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 vs Windows Server 2012 And this would be spent on a GUI, for a system which seldomly needs one, if at all. Multiplied by 20, which is not a big cluster size, we are talking of 2.5 GB РІР‚вЂњ which could easily make up a config server or arbiter, if not more. How much RAM does a given Windows Server system use while idling? How does this compare to any given Linux Server idling? Let's be nice and assume that the Windows server just needs 128M for its GUI - it is 128MB wasted.

As for the inefficient RAM usage, you might want to check it for yourself.

As for the filesystem speed: Comparing Filesystem I/O performance: RedHat Enterprise 6 vs.

So index files might be read from disk than from RAM, which is orders of magnitude slower.Р”В«ottom line: it is a Really Bad IdeaРІвЂћСћ to run a production mongoDB on a Windows system. Windows takes a much larger share of the available RAM than a Linux machine. MongoDB uses as much RAM as possible (up to the point it needs), for example for storing (copies of) index files in RAM. Plus: Windows is not as efficient with RAM as Linux is.

While Linux' iptables is fast and efficient enough so that the great part of firewall appliances is based on it, the firewalls available for Windows are not, for various reasons.

Third: if you have a firewall running on your box, latency becomes an even bigger problem for remote access. The network stack on a current Linux system simply is faster than on a W2008 server.

Compared to XFS or ext4, they are up to 40% slower when both the Windows and Linux file systems are optimized. First: all of the filesystems abailable on Windows 2008 server are very, very inefficient.